I actually agree that cartoons depicting minors as both sexual and obscene should be classified similarly to child porn.
I think the difference lies in penalty. Evidence of cartoons, drawings and artwork of minors should be enough to get a warrant to search for actual child abuse materials, but the possession alone should not carry major …
I actually agree that cartoons depicting minors as both sexual and obscene should be classified similarly to child porn.
I think the difference lies in penalty. Evidence of cartoons, drawings and artwork of minors should be enough to get a warrant to search for actual child abuse materials, but the possession alone should not carry major penalty.
producing such materials should incur a penalty significant enough to deter CP-adjacent activity. A short gaol sentence seems appropriate to me.
As libertarians we understand supply & demand well and with child porn if we cut the supply by every reasonable means possible; we cut the demand and we keep children safe.
I actually agree that cartoons depicting minors as both sexual and obscene should be classified similarly to child porn.
I think the difference lies in penalty. Evidence of cartoons, drawings and artwork of minors should be enough to get a warrant to search for actual child abuse materials, but the possession alone should not carry major penalty.
producing such materials should incur a penalty significant enough to deter CP-adjacent activity. A short gaol sentence seems appropriate to me.
As libertarians we understand supply & demand well and with child porn if we cut the supply by every reasonable means possible; we cut the demand and we keep children safe.