5 Comments
User's avatar
Peter Cunningham's avatar

Long time no chat. Your articles I thoroughly enjoy as they are factual, well written and easy to read. If ever in Bowral - call in for a cuppa. Give me a buzz: 0418246545

Rachael  Morgan's avatar

Yes the judiciary is not the lawmaker, although I fear that our government makes some dreadful laws.

Andrew's avatar

I am not a lawyer, but I have studied the law. During my studies, it became apparent to me that our modern judges are a pale shadow when compared to their predecessors. The role of a judge is to enforce the law as she is wrote and, where necessary, to provide clarity. A civil society requires certainty in the law. I will go as far as to say that in my uneducated and unprofessional opinion, after studying the law, the Mabo decision appears to be nothing more than a court contrivance and is in no way supported by the law or facts.

Peter Cunningham's avatar

Long time no chat. (second attempt) Your articles are always a pleasure to read because they are factual and concise. If ever in Bowral - call in 0418246545

David Leyonhjelm's avatar

Andrew - I similarly have a law degree but I'm not a lawyer. I agree with you entirely regarding the Mabo decision.

However, as you will be aware the common law is entirely created by judges in superior courts. Lower courts treat it as precedent. Given not all our law is statute based, it is inevitable that there will be some inclination to apply the same more broadly. I don't think modern judges are any worse than their predecessors, but they are certainly no better.