Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tyler Green's avatar

Duly noted 🧡

Expand full comment
April Payne's avatar

Unfortunately I have to agree with David’s first comment above. Your argument against extending the citizenship time because it would ‘infringe on freedom of association’ is very one-dimensional and does not address the very real issue of Australia’s mass migration problem. Considering freedom of association alone is not sufficient on the broader scale of migration issues — which requires consideration of national interests, not just the personal interests of migrants. That should not even have to be stated, I thought it was so obvious! Attainment of citizenship is a necessarily high bar because it is the manifestation of Australians collectively (as a nation) exercising *our* right of freedom of association and choosing who is allowed to join our great nation. The interests of the country need to be put before migrants’ personal interests. Most Australians possessing common sense would agree. The uptick in the One Nation vote suggests this.

In your pro-trans rights argument you have dismissed the very real, and dare I say more important, issue of women’s rights. Increasingly people are becoming aware that men masquerading as women suddenly have more individual freedoms than actual women. This issue is one that conservatives and real (‘old-school’) feminists can agree on, and it would therefore win far more votes than yet another pandering pro-trans policy, in my opinion. I understand these are your personal reasons for not voting for the Libertarian party, but I don’t think you can really say that the party has gone ‘too conservative’ and will lose votes because they are not in alignment with your ‘more libertarian’ thoughts on these highly specific issues. Perhaps that was not your inference, but I think the party’s stance on these issues will actually help them win votes.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?