I very much doubt it lies within the constitutionally granted powers of government to hand the powers we grant it to an outside organisation, irrevocably. Rather, this tastes more of treason because it seeks to overpower the ultimate authority, that of the people.
The Liberal and Labor Parties are corporations owned by one international corporation. The people have already been hypnotized by the media which is owned by the same corporation. You just can't make this up. Treason is really an understatement.
I absolutely agree. But this is the game. The WHO will claim that it is simply making "recommendations". The building of the 'problem invention industrial complex' will be done by each nation's government. It will also be the local government that force-medicates the citizens, and imposes lockdowns, "quarantines", vaccine passports etc. The local government will rack up multi-hundred-billion-dollar public debts to buy worthless medications and licenses. Both the government and WHO are already arguing that powers are NOT being granted to an outside organisation. Nudge, nudge; wink, wink. So, you could argue that sovereignty is being ceded to the WHO. Or you could argue that the WHO is giving local governments cover to suspend constitutions, ignore human rights laws and commit criminal acts against their citizens. Either way, they are working in cahoots to absolve each other of responsibility. A government accepting the IHR amendments and signing the pandemic agreement demonstrates that they WANT the dystopian tyranny that the WHO is pimping. So, I 100% agree that it looks, sounds and tastes like treason. But the WHO and government will both argue that it's not technically treason.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
Is Trump going to reject these amendments?
Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
Is Trump going to reject these amendments?
Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
Is Trump going to reject these amendments?
Yes, the US rejected the IHR amendments, as did Italy.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
Is Trump going to reject these amendments?
I very much doubt it lies within the constitutionally granted powers of government to hand the powers we grant it to an outside organisation, irrevocably. Rather, this tastes more of treason because it seeks to overpower the ultimate authority, that of the people.
What constitution we have no Governor General.
The Liberal and Labor Parties are corporations owned by one international corporation. The people have already been hypnotized by the media which is owned by the same corporation. You just can't make this up. Treason is really an understatement.
I absolutely agree. But this is the game. The WHO will claim that it is simply making "recommendations". The building of the 'problem invention industrial complex' will be done by each nation's government. It will also be the local government that force-medicates the citizens, and imposes lockdowns, "quarantines", vaccine passports etc. The local government will rack up multi-hundred-billion-dollar public debts to buy worthless medications and licenses. Both the government and WHO are already arguing that powers are NOT being granted to an outside organisation. Nudge, nudge; wink, wink. So, you could argue that sovereignty is being ceded to the WHO. Or you could argue that the WHO is giving local governments cover to suspend constitutions, ignore human rights laws and commit criminal acts against their citizens. Either way, they are working in cahoots to absolve each other of responsibility. A government accepting the IHR amendments and signing the pandemic agreement demonstrates that they WANT the dystopian tyranny that the WHO is pimping. So, I 100% agree that it looks, sounds and tastes like treason. But the WHO and government will both argue that it's not technically treason.