Democracy’s Christian Firewall is Cracking – and Gen Z is Handing Out Matches

It’s been said that ‘Optimists learn English, pessimists learn Chinese, and realists learn how to use an AK47.’

We’re probably not quite at that stage just yet but it is good to be reminded as to how and why we are not.

Above the Courts of Justice in London stands a statue of Jesus. It is there to signify the Common Law’s origins in Christianity.

When the King is presented with the Bible, these words are spoken, “To keep your Majesty ever mindful of the law and the Gospel of God, …. we present you with this Book, the most valuable thing this world affords. Here is wisdom; this is the royal law; these are the lively oracles of God”.

Stephen Langton, Archbishop of Canterbury (1207-1228) helped write the Magna Carta, the world’s pre-eminent document on human rights and the basis of so many of our laws.

A November 2025 Report published by Flinders University, Turning Away from Democracy? Democratic Antipathy and Support for Undemocratic Practices Among Young Australians, found that only 56 per cent of young Australians (18–29) believe democracy is the best form of government.

Some of its other findings were equally alarming. For example, 38 per cent of young Australians support ‘the use of force to prevent policies they disagree with from being enacted’; 39 per cent agree that ‘the government should be able to bend the law when required’; 36 per cent agree that ‘the Prime Minister should be able to ignore court decisions’; and 25 per cent support ‘committing voter fraud to prevent a party they dislike from winning’.

When our system of government is being questioned in this way, it is time to consider some of the world’s alternatives. Writer Evan Thompson provides a useful summary:

• Theocracy. A form of government in which a specific religious ideology determines the leadership, laws and customs of the country. Iran is the world’s largest theocracy in which the Ayatollahs — Shiite religious leaders — rule the country and implement Islamic Sharia law. Iran has immense influence on several neighbouring countries.

• Military Dictatorships. Rule by a single authority with absolute power and no democratic process. Installed by the nation’s armed forces, military dictators dismiss due process, civil liberties, and political freedoms. Dissent or political opposition is banned by the ruling military junta. Examples include Myanmar, Sudan, Chad and Mali.

• Monarchy. Not to be confused with Constitutional Monarchies such as our own, ruling monarchies have a person as head of state for life, a position passed down through a succession line related to bloodline and birth order within a ruling royal family. Today’s monarchies include Saudi Arabia, Morocco and Oman.

• Communism. A centralized form of government headed by a single authoritarian political party. Involves total control of the economy including production, labour, goods, property and natural resources. Communist countries include China, Cuba, Laos and Vietnam.

• Totalitarianism. A form of government in which the ruling party has no limitations whatsoever on its power. Its citizens are completely subservient to the state. A single figure often holds power and maintains authority through widespread surveillance, control of the media, military or police power, and suppression of protest, activism, or political opposition. North Korea is an example of a totalitarian state. Any criticism of the supreme leader is punishable by death.

• Authoritarianism – a lesser form of totalitarianism in which an authoritarian government rejects political plurality and uses strong central power to preserve the status quo. Authoritarianism pays little regard to the rule of law, the separation of powers between parliament and the courts, or democratic voting. Much of Central and Eastern Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean falls into this category.

Of the 193 countries in the world, 153 of them are governed by one of these non-democratic systems. Barely 40 countries are functioning democracies. And of those 40, 36 have a Judeo-Christian heritage while the other four (India, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan) had strong Christian/Western influence that led them to democracy.

The link between Christianity and stable democracy is obvious; sometimes we need to remind ourselves of Christianity’s great contributions to the world.

The late Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said, “To defend a country you need an army. But to defend a free society you need families, schools and an educational system in which ideals are passed on from one generation to the next, and never lost, or despaired of, or obscured. It is not difficult to gain liberty, but to sustain it is the work of a hundred generations. Forget it and you lose it.”

And in Australia, judging by that stunning poll of young people, we are indeed ‘forgetting it and losing it’.

Authoritarianism is what comes next.

What those who support ‘the use of force to prevent policies they disagree with from being enacted’; and that ‘the government should be able to bend the law when required’; and that ‘the Prime Minister should be able to ignore court decisions’, never consider of course – perhaps a symptom of what has been called, ‘main character syndrome’, the mindset where people see themselves as the main protagonist and other people are just supporting characters – is a scenario where they themselves are the ones being targeted.

That a significant percentage of young people think this way gives governments all the licence they need.

The Metadata Retention Law (Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Act 2015), for example, was fiercely fought. A number of senators – myself and fellow Liberty Itch contributor David Leyonhjelm included – pushed hard against its introduction but it was passed with the support of both Liberal and Labor.

This is how authoritarianism gets a foothold.